<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Chain-of-Custody on it-learn.io | IT, Networking &amp; Cybersecurity Blog</title><link>https://blog.it-learn.io/tags/chain-of-custody/</link><description>Recent content in Chain-of-Custody on it-learn.io | IT, Networking &amp; Cybersecurity Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.it-learn.io/tags/chain-of-custody/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Chain of Custody: The Single Mistake That Loses Court Cases</title><link>https://blog.it-learn.io/posts/2026-05-31-chain-of-custody-digital-forensics-court-mistakes/</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://blog.it-learn.io/posts/2026-05-31-chain-of-custody-digital-forensics-court-mistakes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A digital forensic examiner spends years learning how to recover deleted files, parse registry hives, and reconstruct attacker timelines from sparse evidence. None of that matters if the evidence is inadmissible in court.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chain of custody is the documentation discipline that keeps evidence admissible. It is not technically hard — it is a form, signatures, and storage rules. But it is the single most common reason digital evidence gets thrown out, and every working examiner has a story about a case where a sloppy chain undid weeks of investigative work.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>