<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Identity-Security on it-learn.io | IT, Networking &amp; Cybersecurity Blog</title><link>https://blog.it-learn.io/tags/identity-security/</link><description>Recent content in Identity-Security on it-learn.io | IT, Networking &amp; Cybersecurity Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.it-learn.io/tags/identity-security/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>ITDR on Cisco ISE: Behavioral Identity Scoring with AWS Serverless</title><link>https://blog.it-learn.io/posts/2026-05-12-itdr-on-cisco-ise-behavioral-identity-scoring-aws-serverless/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://blog.it-learn.io/posts/2026-05-12-itdr-on-cisco-ise-behavioral-identity-scoring-aws-serverless/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Cisco ISE knows who authenticated, where, when, and how. It does not know whether that authentication looks like that identity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ISE treats every RADIUS or TACACS+ exchange as a discrete event. There is no behavioral baseline. No identity risk score. No native ITDR. The way most teams close that gap today is SIEM correlation — stitch ISE, Stealthwatch, XDR, and Splunk together and let the SOC see the anomaly minutes or hours after the fact. By then the session is established, the lateral move happened, the screenshot is in the breach report.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>