<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Token-Theft on it-learn.io | IT, Networking &amp; Cybersecurity Blog</title><link>https://blog.it-learn.io/tags/token-theft/</link><description>Recent content in Token-Theft on it-learn.io | IT, Networking &amp; Cybersecurity Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.it-learn.io/tags/token-theft/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>OAuth Token Theft: Hijacking App Permissions Without Stealing Passwords</title><link>https://blog.it-learn.io/posts/2026-04-25-oauth-token-theft-hijacking-app-permissions/</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://blog.it-learn.io/posts/2026-04-25-oauth-token-theft-hijacking-app-permissions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;OAuth 2.0 was designed to solve a real problem: letting users grant third-party applications access to their resources without sharing their passwords. The protocol achieved that goal. What it did not anticipate was an ecosystem of high-value cloud identities, loosely governed application registrations, and attackers sophisticated enough to abuse the delegation model itself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OAuth token theft attacks do not require stealing a password. They do not require bypassing MFA. In the most effective variants, they use Microsoft&amp;rsquo;s own legitimate infrastructure — devicelogin.microsoft.com — as the delivery mechanism. Understanding these attacks means understanding how OAuth&amp;rsquo;s trust model can be inverted.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>